8 Comments
User's avatar
bekeanloinse's avatar

The Black Friday/Cyber Monday offer is super generous, especially with the bonus months for loyal subscribers—what a thoughtful way to work around the system! For anyone who's been on the fence about subscribing, this is definitely the time to jump in. And for existing readers, it’s such a fun sneak peek at what’s coming next: author photo adventures, copyediting deep dives, marketing plans, and all the publishing myths you’re always ready to debunk.

https://subwaysurfersgame.io

Expand full comment
Jesus Lyons's avatar

I’d love to see more on the business side of publishing, like insights into agent pitch decks (that sounds intriguing!) or practical advice on marketing strategies for debut authors. I’ve found your Q&A Thursdays incredibly helpful, so I’d vote for keeping those around! https://geometry-dashworld.co/

Expand full comment
Andrew Kass's avatar

Hi, Kate - I did just extend Agents and Books for a year and tried to email your Substack account from my own domain, but my message got flagged and blocked. So here's the message:

Happy Black Friday.

I have just extended my subscription to Agents+Books for a year, and posted to FB Writers Helping Writers group where I am active.

Wishing you and yours a healthy and bounteous season.

Andy Kass

Expand full comment
Kate McKean's avatar

You're all set!

Expand full comment
Annie Wilson's avatar

Would love to know if it's appropriate to query agents by inviting them to read my work on Substack? I'm finding it a bit incongruous that the prevailing advice on Substack from agents and publishers talks about submitting manuscripts the old-fashioned way, via email, and simply "being patient"... Honestly, I have a 150K+ word manuscript live here on the platform and it's in good shape. I just worry that agents or publishers will not take me seriously if I invite them to read it here, versus compiling it into a PDF and sending. Philosophically, if Substack is the new "disruptive" platform for writers, I should think the publishing world would approach it disruptively, but what do I know? Thank you!

Expand full comment
Kate McKean's avatar

This sounds like it could work but honestly there is a lot of information provided in a query that agents need and/or want that wouldn't be provided in substack posts. Also, reading a blog/online/newsletter is different than reading even an excerpt from a novel so I would think you'd need to do a good amount of editing for it to read well in whole-novel form. I mean, you have to compile and edit it regardless if you want to be traditionally published. Some agents/editors may think that if the whole thing is available for free online, why would anyone buy that book? Sometimes that's true and other times it's not. Many, many, many things try to disrupt book publishing but I don't think this aspect of substack has had a big effect on it. Publishing is notoriously slow to change, for better or worse.

Expand full comment
Annie Wilson's avatar

Thank you! Yes, the dread "why would anyone buy this if it's online" is a big question, but seems to be working as a way for authors to get noticed. Perhaps thinking that someone who puts a novel online and is a "one and done" isn't fair: the book could be re-edited, re-titled, developed, tightened, etc, not to mention sequels could be a possibility. It also proves wether or not the writer can write a good story regardless of having a manuscript in contract. Wouldn't that save time in the vetting process? Perhaps scouting a writer before they need to edit and compile a manuscript just to send it off would be beneficial and expedient for both sides? "Hi, I like what you have here and think it has potential, but you aren't ready. Ping me when you do a re-write..."

As Substack is quick and open, it would be ideal for agents and publishers to scout. The writers I know on the platform do want to be published traditionally (like I do) but are stymied by the process and timeline. I think the thinking is that, if we put it out here where the agents are already spending time, it will be found (but maybe that's just a Substack myth). The available content is changing, ergo the methods need to change.

Personally, when I pursued the "traditional" way, my manuscript became such a chore and really sapped my creativity, putting a lot of pressure on something I needed to be fun and exhilarating to maintain the story. (And believe me, I tried. I got to 250 pages in about 3 years and it stopped coming.)The serial format has been great; keeps me accountable, keeps the writing fresh, and I'm not overwhelmed by it. Substack is great for immediate responses and feedback too. It's allowed me to play and let the story evolve in a beautiful way, while getting said feedback. I know I'm not the only one. Just making the case that there's a lot of talent on this very platform and while maybe Substack isn't disrupting publishing, a lot of writers on Substack are certainly putting in effort in that direction. However, it seems the writers are playing a one-sided tennis match... Again, thanks so much for your input!

Expand full comment
Kate McKean's avatar

Ok, so I thought I had figured out all the ways I could make this sale work for current subscribers but of course I forgot that current annual subscribers are already on auto-renew. So if you're on auto-renew and want to participate in this special, email me, I will extend your sub 4 months and we'll go on the honor system that you're not going to just like turn around and unsubscribe before the auto renew kicks in. Is this best for solution (for me)? No. Is it the best solution for you (those who will honor this sale as it was intended)? Yes. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Expand full comment